<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is it photo&#8217;s or photos?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://baxtercommunications.nl/areas-areas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://baxtercommunications.nl/areas-areas/</link>
	<description>Global communications in English</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2017 15:27:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Johnson</title>
		<link>https://baxtercommunications.nl/areas-areas/#comment-13335</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2017 15:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baxtercommunications.nl/?p=5004#comment-13335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Strawb&#039;s, pot&#039;s and tom&#039;s are all examples of BAD English usage. That slovenly use of the language should not be used as an excuse to add an apostrophe to an obviously plural word.
If I wrote ... the pot&#039;s lid, it would mean the lid of a pot; nothing to do with potatoes. 
The apostrophe is used to indicate the possessive. e.g &quot;the photo&#039;s colour saturation&quot;, which is not a plural]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strawb&#8217;s, pot&#8217;s and tom&#8217;s are all examples of BAD English usage. That slovenly use of the language should not be used as an excuse to add an apostrophe to an obviously plural word.<br />
If I wrote &#8230; the pot&#8217;s lid, it would mean the lid of a pot; nothing to do with potatoes.<br />
The apostrophe is used to indicate the possessive. e.g &#8220;the photo&#8217;s colour saturation&#8221;, which is not a plural</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Lester George</title>
		<link>https://baxtercommunications.nl/areas-areas/#comment-7831</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Graham Lester George]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 23:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baxtercommunications.nl/?p=5004#comment-7831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[grahamlestergeorge@mac.com

The apostrophe in &quot;photo&#039;s&quot; has nothing to do with pluralising. The apostrophe is there to replace the missing letters of &quot;photographs&quot;. Just as my mother would write on her shopping list: Punnet of strawb&#039;s; 2lb pot&#039;s; 1lb of tom&#039;s; collect photo&#039;s from chemist&#039;s shop. Strawberries - Strawb&#039;s; Potatoes - Pot&#039;s; Tomatoes - Tom&#039;s; Photo&#039;s - Photographs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="mailto:grahamlestergeorge@mac.com">grahamlestergeorge@mac.com</a></p>
<p>The apostrophe in &#8220;photo&#8217;s&#8221; has nothing to do with pluralising. The apostrophe is there to replace the missing letters of &#8220;photographs&#8221;. Just as my mother would write on her shopping list: Punnet of strawb&#8217;s; 2lb pot&#8217;s; 1lb of tom&#8217;s; collect photo&#8217;s from chemist&#8217;s shop. Strawberries &#8211; Strawb&#8217;s; Potatoes &#8211; Pot&#8217;s; Tomatoes &#8211; Tom&#8217;s; Photo&#8217;s &#8211; Photographs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
